musiktherapie.meTherapeuten finden
Deutsch →

Pilot study completed · research report of 23 August 2026

Musically Supported Bonding — Results of the Pilot Study

A three-stage music therapy intervention to foster early bonding during pregnancy · MSH Medical School Hamburg

n = 2

participants (weeks 16 and 23)

3 × 90 min

workshop sessions

4 weeks

6 June – 5 July 2026

Mixed methods

convergent parallel

Key findings at a glance

Stronger sense of bonding

Both participants reported a stronger bond with their unborn child and more conscious moments of connection. The mean MAAS score rose by 3.7 % and 20.9 %.

More humming and singing for the baby

Items on humming and singing for the baby rose for both. An actual increase in everyday singing, however, could not be clearly demonstrated.

Partners belong in the picture

“Partner involvement” was the most frequently coded category for both — both explicitly wished their partners had been included.

A relaxing bodily experience

Voice and warm-up exercises were experienced as soothing and relaxing; both would recommend singing during pregnancy.

Context: with n = 2, no control group and a short study period, the findings cannot be generalised and no inferential tests were run. They offer first indications for developing the approach further.

Abstract

Vocalisation and singing are low-threshold forms of pre-linguistic communication; however, they feature very little in the everyday lives of expectant parents in Germany. Drawing on the Songs of Kin approach – in particular the creation of personalised lullabies and the use of one’s own voice – the three-stage music therapy intervention programme ‘Musically Supported Bonding’ (MSB) was developed, implemented and evaluated as part of this pilot project, and its impact on the prenatal bonding experience of expectant mothers was investigated.

Due to n = 2, the lack of a control group and the short study period, the findings cannot be generalised. However, they provide initial evidence that the MSB offers a viable framework for foetus-oriented singing and suggest that partners should be included in the further development of the manual.

Excerpt from the abstract of the research report

The study

Research question

How does the three-stage intervention Musically Supported Bonding foster the active use of the voice and the bond between expectant mothers and their unborn child?

Design
Exploratory pilot study in a convergent parallel mixed-methods design (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018): a quantitative pre-post measurement and qualitative interviews, related to each other.
Instruments
Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale, German short form with 13 items (Condon, 2015; Lehnig et al., 2024; α ≥ 0.69) and a modified 9-item music activity scale (after Politimou et al., 2018), each at T1 and T2.
Interviews & analysis
Guided individual interviews after session 3 (13 and 14 min), transcribed and analysed with qualitative content analysis after Kuckartz (2018) — deductive from the interview guide, extended inductively (9 main categories). In addition: observation sheets for every session.
Sample
Included: adult women with a physiological pregnancy in weeks 12–26, sufficient German, written consent. Excluded among others: high-risk pregnancy, acute psychiatric crisis. 4–8 participants were planned, 2 took part.
Ethics & data protection
Ethics application approved (MSH vote 2026-20). Voluntary participation, withdrawable at any time. Data pseudonymised, key list stored separately, personal details removed from transcripts.

Project timeline

  1. Preparation

    Workshop manual developed with midwife feedback

  2. Preparation

    Ethics application submitted and approved (MSH vote 2026-20)

  3. Preparation

    Recruitment: video, website, 50 posters in Hamburg-Harburg

  4. 6 Jun 2026

    Session 1 · time point T1 (MAAS + music activity)

  5. 20 Jun 2026

    Session 2 · developing songs for the baby

  6. 5 Jul 2026

    Session 3 · T2 measurement · guided interviews

  7. 23 Aug 2026

    Research report submitted

The method developed: three sessions of 90 minutes

Based on the Songs of Kin intervention (Loewy, 2013/2015), a workshop manual was developed together with a midwife and adapted several times following feedback from birth centres, midwives, music therapists and family counselling services. Core idea: any piece of music a participant brings can become her own lullaby. The lullaby “Thula Baba” is the leitmotif of all sessions.

1

Discovering one’s own voice

  • Introductions, musical resources, questionnaires (T1)
  • Warm-up: stretching, tapping, yawning
  • Voice exercises: toning, babbling, low humming, humming, bee breath
  • First bonding song “Thula Baba” · education: pre-verbal communication
  • Closing sound journey

Between sessions: Listen to music, choose a favourite song or possible lullaby

2

Developing songs for the baby

  • Warm-up and voice exercises, review of the week
  • Listen to the songs brought along on headphones and vocalise
  • Turn a favourite song into a personal lullaby
  • Education: effects and uses of lullabies
  • Vocal improvisation to the body tambura

Between sessions: Sing the song you developed to your unborn child

3

Deepening the bond & transfer to everyday life

  • Reflection on the previous sessions
  • Education: prenatal bonding development
  • Finalise the personal lullaby, sing and hum together
  • Questionnaires (T2), followed by individual interviews
  • How can what was learned continue in everyday life?
Workshop manual as PDF (4 pages, German) ↓

Results

Quantitative: before-and-after comparison

Both participants completed the questionnaires fully at both time points. With n = 2, individual trajectories are described descriptively.

MAAS · participant 1

+3.7 %

Ø 4.08 → 4.23

MAAS · participant 2

+20.9 %

Ø 3.31 → 4.00

Music activity · participant 1

+57.5 %

Ø 2.33 → 3.67

Music activity · participant 2

+24.0 %

Ø 2.33 → 2.89

Prenatal attachment (MAAS short form) by item

T1 · before session 1 (6 June)T2 · after session 3 (5 July)Scale 1 (not at all) – 5 (very strongly)
Item 3 · Feelings towards the baby
TN1
±0
TN2
+1
Item 7 · Baby depends on me
TN1
±0
TN2
±0
Item 9 · Thoughts (irritated → tender)
TN1
±0
TN2
+2
Item 10 · Clear picture of the baby
TN1
+1
TN2
+1
Item 11 · Feelings (sad → happy)
TN1
±0
TN2
±0
Item 13 · Emotional closeness
TN1
±0
TN2
+1
Item 15 · Anticipation of first contact
TN1
±0
TN2
+1
Item 1 · How often thought of the baby
TN1
±0
TN2
+2
Item 2 · Strength of feelings
TN1
+1
TN2
+2
Item 4 · Wish to read information
TN1
±0
TN2
±0
Item 5 · Imagined the baby
TN1
+1
TN2
−1
Item 8 · Talked to the baby alone
TN1
±0
TN2
+1
Item 17 · Dreams about the baby
TN1
−1
TN2
−1
Show as table
ItemParticipant 1 (T1 / T2 / Δ)Participant 2 (T1 / T2 / Δ)
Item 3 · Feelings towards the baby55±045+1
Item 7 · Baby depends on me44±044±0
Item 9 · Thoughts (irritated → tender)44±035+2
Item 10 · Clear picture of the baby45+123+1
Item 11 · Feelings (sad → happy)44±044±0
Item 13 · Emotional closeness55±034+1
Item 15 · Anticipation of first contact55±045+1
Item 1 · How often thought of the baby55±024+2
Item 2 · Strength of feelings34+124+2
Item 4 · Wish to read information55±055±0
Item 5 · Imagined the baby34+154−1
Item 8 · Talked to the baby alone33±023+1
Item 17 · Dreams about the baby32−132−1
  • Rose for both: item 10 (clear picture of the baby) and item 2 (strength of feelings).
  • Opposite directions: item 5 (imagined the baby) rose for participant 1 and fell for participant 2.
  • Fell for both: item 17 (dreams about the baby).
  • The larger rise for participant 2 may relate to her earlier stage of pregnancy (week 16 rather than 23).

Musical activity in the past 14 days by item

T1 · before session 1 (6 June)T2 · after session 3 (5 July)Scale 1 (not at all) – 5 (very strongly)
Item 1 · Hummed (low) for my baby
TN1
+3
TN2
+2
Item 2 · Hummed for my baby
TN1
+3
TN2
+2
Item 3 · Sang to my baby
TN1
+1
TN2
+1
Item 4 · Felt fetal movement while singing
TN1
+1
TN2
+1
Item 5 · Sang/hummed at home
TN1
+3
TN2
±0
Item 6 · Sang/hummed outside the home
TN1
+2
TN2
±0
Item 7 · Sang/hummed alone
TN1
+1
TN2
±0
Item 8 · Sang/hummed with others
TN1
−2
TN2
±0
Item 9 · Listened to music
TN1
±0
TN2
−1
Show as table
ItemParticipant 1 (T1 / T2 / Δ)Participant 2 (T1 / T2 / Δ)
Item 1 · Hummed (low) for my baby14+324+2
Item 2 · Hummed for my baby14+324+2
Item 3 · Sang to my baby34+123+1
Item 4 · Felt fetal movement while singing12+112+1
Item 5 · Sang/hummed at home14+333±0
Item 6 · Sang/hummed outside the home13+211±0
Item 7 · Sang/hummed alone45+122±0
Item 8 · Sang/hummed with others42−233±0
Item 9 · Listened to music55±054−1
  • Items 1–4 (humming and singing for the baby, feeling movements meanwhile) rose for both.
  • Items 5–7 (at home, outside, alone) rose only for participant 1.
  • Singing with others and listening to music declined for one participant each.
  • Session 2 notes show both said they had not sung more often. Part of the rise probably reflects the activity within the workshop itself.

Qualitative: what the participants experienced

Nine main categories — six deductively from the interview guide, three inductively from the material (HK 7–9). Most frequently coded: partner involvement, followed by bonding development.

Coded segments per main category

Participant 1 Participant 2
Show as table
Main categoryParticipant 1Participant 2
HK 1 · Bonding development65
HK 2 · Role & practice of singing52
HK 3 · Partner involvement96
HK 4 · Barriers & facilitators34
HK 5 · Body awareness & regulation45
HK 6 · Recommendation22
HK 7 · Workshop evaluation34
HK 8 · Prior musical experience22
HK 9 · Baby-framing of exercises04
“I don’t know whether it changed, but it definitely got stronger.”
Participant 1 · Bonding
“Okay, now we are here for you.”
Participant 2 · Singing as doing something
“It gives you the feeling of having already been connected with the baby.”
Participant 1 · Recommendation
“It feels similar to after a yoga class. I feel more relaxed.”
Participant 1 · Body
“I found it SO LOVELY that I wasn’t just singing alone at home, but together with the others.”
Participant 2 · Group
“But that feeling of three — me, my husband and the baby — I miss that a little.”
Participant 1 · Partner involvement

Quotes translated from the German interview transcripts.

Discussion

Implementation

All three sessions took place as planned. A song in another language made singing together harder; uncertainty about lyrics can be unsettling in a group. One participant wished the exercises had been explicitly directed at the baby from the start (“baby-framing”).

Singing in everyday life

Questionnaire scores rose, but the accounts also show how hard it is to fit singing into daily life. The workshop offered time, space and structure — and rituals emerged, such as singing together “as three” in the evening.

Partners

Partner involvement was the strongest category for both. Since adults often lack playful, non-verbal access to communication, it may be important to support partners in discovering their voice as well.

Bonding experience

Interviews and MAAS point in the same direction. Even choosing a song brought the baby more into focus — bonding became a more conscious process.

Limitations

  • Very small sample (n = 2), not representative
  • No control group — effects cannot be clearly attributed to the intervention
  • Short period (4 weeks), data collection ends before birth
  • German only — 49.8 % of Harburg residents hold a foreign nationality
  • Narrow gestational window (weeks 12–26) made recruitment harder
  • Partners were not included

Conclusion & outlook

MSB can offer a good way to explore the voice in the service of bonding. Choosing a song for the baby and working with it may be a suitable method to foster expectant mothers’ prenatal bond with their unborn child.

Next steps for research and practice

  1. 1

    Include partners

    Open the manual to expectant parents as a couple and to other future caregivers.

  2. 2

    Larger and controlled

    A larger sample and a control-group design to allow statements about effectiveness.

  3. 3

    Beyond birth

    A longer study period that includes the time after birth.

  4. 4

    Multilingual

    Interpreters or multilingual facilitation to reduce language barriers.

  5. 5

    Direct exercises at the baby

    Baby-framing from the start; choose short, easy-to-sing song sections.

  6. 6

    In cooperation

    Run it with an institution that plans places in advance and integrates the approach into care.

Research report & materials

We provide a redacted excerpt of the (German-language) research report. To protect everyone involved, participants are referred to only as “TN1/TN2”, student ID numbers and co-authors’ surnames are removed, and signatures, consent forms, ethics documents, transcripts and observation sheets are not included.

Suggested citation

MSB research team (2026). Musically Supported Bonding: Eine Pilotstudie zur Evaluation einer dreistufigen Intervention zur frühzeitigen Bindungsförderung während der Schwangerschaft [Research report]. MSH Medical School Hamburg.

Interested in an exchange?

Do you work in obstetrics, music therapy, family counselling or research and would like to discuss the method and results, develop the manual further or explore a cooperation? I look forward to hearing from you.

E-mail Mark Schmidts

[email protected]

Project team

Carried out by students of the BA Music Therapy programme (4th semester, summer 2026) at MSH Medical School Hamburg, Faculty Campus Arts and Social Change, in the module “Empirical Research Methods of the Arts Therapies”. Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Anne-Katrin Jordan.

  • Mark Schmidts· Contact
  • Carlotta A.
  • Megi A.
  • Lena M.

Read more